Talk:Movado

flagrant pov
Either someone copy/pasted from the company's website or it written by Movado PR. Unbelievably lacking in NPOV. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.240.35.236 (talk) 01:56, 31 March 2015 (UTC)


 * I tried to clean it up a bit. skeptical scientist (talk) 14:15, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Appropriate Picture
Since the article alludes to the typical Movado watch as having no markings for hours, minutes, etc. shouldn't the picture reflect that?
 * It is correct that most Movado watches have no markings other than the 12-o-clock. The current image on the page show such a timepiece. Also, please sign your posts.

Boss's Watch?
The comment about the Museum Dial being the "boss's watch" makes no sense and is probably untrue. There's no support for the comment that the boss doesn't have to be on time, that timekeeping is "vague" without minute and hour ticks marked (people who own the watch can presumably learn to tell), or that anyone actually calls it the "boss's watch." When I googled "boss's watch" in connection with Movado, the only entries that came up were for this wikipedia article so I suspect the writer made up the comment or lifted it from a small group of friends.

Fair use rationale for Image:Movadomuseum.jpg
Image:Movadomuseum.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 07:08, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Removed Irrelevant Link
Removed link to Mortal Combat character. Had nothing to do with watch brand, just similar spelling. 129.2.218.203 (talk) 03:15, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

Status Symbol??
I've looked up Movado Watches on amazon, and the prices go into the thousands. Is it possible that Movado Watches could be status symbols (I highly doubt it, tho)? If so, maybe someone could place it in the Status Symbol page. Montgomery&#39; 39 (talk) 22:18, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

Marketing bias
The article generally appears to be a sales pitch. It is certainly not objective. Unfortunately I feel unqualified to address this issue. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.131.133.48 (talk) 21:44, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Lack of references in the "Brands" section
Hi, I am a new user to Wikipedia. I noticed there is a lack of references in the "Brands" section. I feel adding references to each of brands that they own could give audiences a better idea of a timeline in which when Movado acquired those brands. --Yauchemliu (talk) 20:48, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

Esperanto meaning is wrong
As far as I can tell, "movado" is a noun meaning "movement", saying nothing about the regularity of the movement Vpzom (talk) 16:20, 12 September 2021 (UTC)