Talk:Move (MercyMe song)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: InTheAM (talk · contribs) 03:30, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Good job. Only the few issues listed below need fixed. They're mostly grammar issues that I can help with if you need it.

1. Well Written
 * (a)Prose
 * "Maroon 5" is listed as a song by Maroon 5 in the lead.
 * Fixed
 * "The lyrical content of the song revolves around perseverance through adversity." This sentence might be better if it said the "theme of the lyrics of the song is perseverance through adversity. It would be less wordy.
 * Done
 * May 23, 2011, -- needs a comma after 2011.
 * Done
 * The song did not "attain" positive reception. It was "received with positive critical reviews, especially for the arrangement of the song."
 * Fixed
 * semicolons in the series of rankings in the lead.
 * Not quite sure what you mean there Got it.  InThe AM  02:41, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
 * second sentence of background - no comma before "and", "overdubs" should start new sentence.
 * Fixed
 * no comma before and in next sentence, either.
 * Fixed
 * quotation marks need fixed in this sentence: "Kevin Davis of Christian Music Review commented that the song "has a fantastic rock-dance arrangement like “This Love” by Maroon 5."
 * Fixed
 * comma after "embarrassing" in McCall quote and "In" should not be capitalized.
 * Fixed
 * no commas before "and" several times in chart performance.
 * Fixed
 * Chart performance ends without finishing.
 * Fixed
 * (b)MOS
 * Lead - The sentences about the rankings are the same as the ones in the main section. The lead needs to be a summary. It does cover the whole article, though.
 * Shortened
 * The video section either needs expanded or moved into another section.
 * It is far to small and not really notable in the grand scheme of things, so I removed it.
 * The rankings in the "Weekly Charts" need cited. I know they are in the article, but they also need to be in the chart.  Also, the citations for the other chart should be moved into the rankings column.
 * Fixed, but what other chart?
 * The "Year end" chart, but you got it. I would suggest moving the citations into the ranking column. InThe AM  02:41, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
 * They have been moved. Is it good too pass now?  Toa   Nidhiki  05  02:53, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

2. Factually accurate and verifiable
 * Citations are good. Sources are good.  Besides the issues mentioned in 1(b), there are no issues with citations.

3. Broad in its coverage
 * Article has sufficient detail and stays on topic.

4. Neutral
 * NPOV, balanced.

5. Stable
 * Article is stable. No edit wars.

6. Illustrated
 * I don't know if the picture is going to work. It is pretty poor in quality and I'm not sure it contributes much to the article since there is only one sentence about the video.

On hold for now. InThe AM 19:28, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

All done. Listed. InThe AM  14:52, 2 February 2012 (UTC)