Talk:Mozart Was a Red

Notability
All I see is an unpublished play only discussed by the friends and co-workers of its author. This article needs independent RS to demonstrate notability. Steeletrap (talk) 04:39, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
 * It is discussed in Brian Doherty's Radicals for Capitalism (page 265, with more info in the endnote on page 667), plus the Sciabarra passage already cited. (Whether Sciabarra had a strong enough connection to Rothbard to be disqualified as "independent" is debatable.) That's all I know of. It is mentioned in passing in Goddess of the Market, but not in a way that satisfies the "significant coverage" criterion of WP:N. Given the brevity of the article (half of it is references and external links) and the existence of reliable sources for the content, the obvious thing to do would be to merge it to the Murray Rothbard article. --RL0919 (talk) 05:43, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the heads-up on the (unconnected) Doherty source. I still however think it pretty epically fails the notability test. Steeletrap (talk) 06:03, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Merge
WP:BLAR accomplished in accordance with AfD determination. – S. Rich (talk) 20:54, 23 December 2013 (UTC)