Talk:Mr.Mr. (EP)

Proposed merge with Back Hug
This song's notability is pretty dubious, as WP:NSONG mandates a song must have generated significant discussion in reliable secondary sources to be considered notable. Additionally, WP:SONGS says most songs, even many notable songs, don't merit separate articles because there is usually not enough non-trivial information to fill an article of good length. Additionally, this article is extremely short and has not a single reliable secondary source. So let's just merge it to its album's article. Shinyang-i (talk) 05:43, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Support. There is absolutely no reason for this song to have a separate article. In case someone brings this up – no, charting isn't enough. Random86 (talk) 07:05, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Support. This song being a non single with no substantial info for the article makes it a little sad. Merge with Mr.Mr. for sure. Ratizi  Angelou  contribs 15:31, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Support. Per WP:NSONGS this song is not notable enough to have a standalone article. Furthermore I would also suggest that Goodbye (Girls' Generation song) and Soul (Girls' Generation song) be merged. HĐ (talk) 08:23, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
 * I agree. I proposed mergers for both of them. Random86 (talk) 05:57, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Proposed merge with Goodbye (Girls' Generation song)
See the above discussion. "Goodbye" is not notable enough for its own article. The only review referenced is an unarchived dead link, and it's a review of the EP. Random86 (talk) 05:50, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Support Per above. HĐ (talk) 06:30, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Proposed merge with Soul (Girls' Generation song)
There doesn't seem to be significant coverage in reliable sources for "Soul". It can be condensed into a paragraph on Mr.Mr. (EP). (The lyrics section is most likely unnecessary.) Random86 (talk) 05:55, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Support Per above. HĐ (talk) 06:30, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed
This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage.) Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Random86 (talk) 06:43, 29 April 2015 (UTC)