Talk:Mr. Hankey, the Christmas Poo/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

I must say, I'm overall pretty impressed by this article. I'll be back with more later. Cheers.  I 'mperator 15:26, 21 April 2009 (UTC) OK, I've just finished going through the entire article, and, to be honest, can't really find any real mistakes, so I'm passing the article now.

A good article is:
 * 1) Well-written: Nice Prose and WP:MOS
 * 2) Factually accurate and verifiable: No original research, just about everything important is verified by accurate sources.
 * 3) Broad in its coverage: Covers main aspects.
 * 4) Neutral: Yes.
 * 5) Stable: Yes.
 * 6) Illustrated, if possible, by images: Yes.

Nicely done! Cheers.  I 'mperator 15:31, 21 April 2009 (UTC)