Talk:MrBeast/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: TrademarkedTWOrantula (talk · contribs) 01:06, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Sorry for abandoning the previous nomination. I had no idea what to do and assumed you were inactive. This time I'll make sure to do a full review. TWOrantula TM (enter the web) 01:06, 25 January 2024 (UTC)


 * gentle ping to check in on this. Are you still intending to review this? Or should we return the article to the queue for someone else to pick up? Ajpolino (talk) 02:53, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Still reviewing. School's really pushing me back on this.  TWOrantula  TM (enter the web) 03:10, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Hi @TrademarkedTWOrantula, reminder ping that this is still outstanding. -- asilvering (talk) 02:11, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Dang it I keep forgetting this nomination  TWOrantula  TM (enter the web) 02:12, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
 * @Endof: Still here?  TWOrantula  TM (enter the web) 06:43, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Yep, still here. I've been busy with my personal life so I apologize for not being active. I've fixed some of the copyvio you've mentioned, and when I have the free time I'll work on the rest of the issues. Endof  talk  16:24, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
 * @Endof: Should I fail this nomination? It's been going on for quite some time. Also, I'm about to go somewhere, and I'd hate to have unfinished business while I'm away.  TWOrantula  TM (enter the web) 00:50, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
 * @Endof: I'll go ahead and fail this again. I'll leave someone with more experience to review this.  TWOrantula  TM (enter the web) 18:23, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

Quickfail?

 * ✅ Article is stable.
 * ✅ There was a prior GA review, but that was only because I was too lazy to finish the review.
 * ✅ Concerning copyvio report . Endof has reduced text. Top result is now at a similarity of 41%.
 * ✅ Haven't read the full article yet... I don't see any blatant issues

Some notes before we begin

 * Okayyyy... so I'm seeing a bunch of questionable sources that are referenced:
 * Mashable, Tubefilter, and a few primary sources are sprinkled throughout the article.
 * WP:PROSELINE in the "Investments and partnerships" and "Personal life" sections

Lead

 * "handle" -> "username"
 * videos estimating the wealth of other YouTubers - Why is this quoted?
 * Why is "counting to 100,000" in quotes?
 * earned tens of thousands of views