Talk:Ms. Pac-Man Maze Madness

Fair use rationale for Image:Mspacmaze.png
Image:Mspacmaze.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 17:48, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Ameteur
The article is very amateur, and plainly looks like it was done by a 7 year-old! It does not have an adequate amount of information on the game. If the game is not that important, it should be moved to the Ms. Pacman article as a subheading, or at least brief information that's better than this.

I actually have the game. It's not bad in my opinion, and, from my knowledge, has the potential of an actual article.

Missing Sub-Headings: Characters Critical Reception Gameplay —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sallyboy44 (talk • contribs) 20:48, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

I've added a fair bit of information I can think would be useful: levels, the Witch Key, the classic arcade mode and the multiplayer mode. Hope this helps! P.S.: would be good if someone could get a screenshot. 86.161.199.178 (talk) 11:35, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

I think its a good wiki and of course more can be added to everything but this is not a review. its got all the right stuff so imo its all good. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.89.0.47 (talk) 18:08, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Version differences
On most ROM sites, for the NTSC-A (North American) release of the game there is a v1.0 ISO/ROM and a v1.1 ISO/ROM If anyone knows the difference (i.e. what bugs were fixed, or changes made) please add! 77.96.157.117 (talk) 22:54, 17 January 2020 (UTC)