Talk:Mueller, She Wrote

Format section
Since User:Drmies did a third revert, we should discuss things here, since that's not appropriate to keep going back and forth. New articles suffer for being short or undersourced. I'm literally in the process of gathering relevant sources. I disagree that the content is unencyclopaedic or that it's promotional. You'll find that the way in which I put this together mirrors many other media and arguably in less depth. Unless you want to start withdrawing content from The Daily Show or The Bill O'Reilly show, I would argue there is bias in the editing process, unless you can provide clear reasoning as to why here in talk, and not in the comments on edits. -- rm 'w a vu  22:39, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Until you stop this ridiculous talk of "bias" I don't have anything to say to you. Drmies (talk) 22:45, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm not saying left-right bias, I'm talking about big-small bias. While less noteable, this passes the litmus test for notability, and therefore it ought to be covered equally as available and sourceable as a larger media outlet or programme. It's not helpful discourse. -- rm 'w a vu  23:03, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
 * You don't appear to understand how Wikipedia works. Notability is about whether an article should exist or not. I clearly established notability with edit 1. All content on Wikipedia must be supported by reliable independent secondary sources. Note the bit about independent and secondary. We can make limited exceptions, but not in order to fill an article with what ends up reading like a PR blurb. Sicut erat in principio, et nunc, et semper. Guy (Help!) 00:12, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Allison Gill, MSW Media sections?
Gill's MSW Media has some 30 podcasts in its network, including shows by Glenn Kirschner, Frank Figliuzzi. Gill also has at least the Daily Beans podcast and, since Dec., Jack w/Andrew McCabe. Heck, maybe Gill should have her own article. Doug Grinbergs (talk) 11:00, 17 January 2023 (UTC)