Talk:Muftak & Kabe

Merge Proposal
I think that the two articles Muftak and Muftak & Kabe should be merged together, as Wikipedia does not have a need for two separate articles on Muftak. Merge. Andy Saund e rs 12:11, 15 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Yeah, I was thinking that - but I couldn't separate the Kabe from Muftak to write about it all. James Random 13:31, 15 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Besides, this article is more generic to Muftak & Kabe as a pair and their adventures as a pair, rather than muftak alone.

I think either a 10 year old or someone who is terrible with english wrote this article, particularly the muftak part. Almost all commas are wrong, the grammar is terrible, and there are multiple typos.--Titan124 14:57, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Talz01.jpg
Image:Talz01.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 07:52, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Kabe.jpg
Image:Kabe.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 22:58, 13 February 2008 (UTC)