Talk:Muller v. Oregon

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Muller v. Oregon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061106220725/http://ocp.hul.harvard.edu/ww/events_muller.html to http://ocp.hul.harvard.edu/ww/events_muller.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 13:06, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Lede; which contract protections?
It's unclear which section of the Constitution was used in the decision: the Freedom of contract inherent in due process clause of 14th Amendment or the Article I Contracts Clause. The revert to status quo is procedural in absence of good information, not a judgment on the merits. ☆ Bri (talk) 15:41, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Possible edits
It seems that this article is written in a way that is quite confusing and possibly contains too much (or irrelevant) information, especially in the opening section. It also contains some stylistic issues (Quote formatting, for example, is inconsistent), along with general grammatical and sentence structure problems (The final sentence of the first paragraph contains four semicolons). I don't think I have adequate enough experience editing Wikipedia to make these substantial changes, so I wanted to make sure to make these issues aware to anyone who would possibly be able to fix them. HonoraryGlass (talk) 01:27, 9 February 2023 (UTC)