Talk:Multi-bearer network

Copyright issue review
The material in the quote comes from a page which claims copyright, However, per discussion at:

User_talk:Moonriddengirl/Archive_48

it appears that the text of a patent is not subject to copyright. The section may still be confusing, so I left that template. The material was orriginally added by an editor who hasn't edited since adding this in 2009.-- SPhilbrick (Talk)  18:56, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Horrible Techno Jargon
Using the patent text as a description is totally pointless as it is made mostly of technological jargon (that is in turn only well defined in the patent context). Please expand and rewrite in a form that normal people can understand. Jahibadkaret (talk) 15:27, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Multi-bearer network. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100105065515/http://www.huawei.com/products/datacomm/catalog.do?id=2515 to http://www.huawei.com/products/datacomm/catalog.do?id=2515
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110612222749/http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/7466719/claims.html to http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/7466719/claims.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 01:45, 8 February 2018 (UTC)