Talk:Multi-scale camouflage/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · contribs) 11:06, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Many thanks for taking this on. Chiswick Chap (talk) 11:24, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Will get to this shortly. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 11:06, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Comments

 * Lead;
 * with work by U.S. Army officer Timothy O'Neill; rank of Neill please
 * Done.


 * CADPAT; mention the full abbreviation on the first mention
 * Done.


 * MARPAT; mention the full abbreviation on the first mention
 * Done.


 * Section 1;
 * does may not see the pattern optimally
 * Used 'will', there's no doubt about it as the pattern will be the wrong scale for their distance.


 * and they do so extremely effectively; remove this, not clear POV
 * Repeated ref for clarity, added quote in ref, it's reliably cited.


 * fractal Vegetato pattern; here fractal is dup-linked
 * Removed.


 * 2003–4 -> 2003–2004; per MOS:DATERANGE
 * Section 2;
 * small (2 inch) squares; use convert for 2 inch
 * Done.


 * Dup-links in section 2.5; Flecktarn, CADPAT, MARPAT, patterns in nature
 * Removed.


 * After the section 2.5, I suggest to use clear so that the following sections do not club with the former.
 * Done.


 * 0% confidence, good work.
 * Thanks.
 * Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 05:11, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
 * @Krishna Chaitanya Velaga: I've addressed all comments to date. Chiswick Chap (talk) 07:34, 26 April 2017 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 01:39, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Many thanks for the review. Chiswick Chap (talk) 05:24, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 01:39, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Many thanks for the review. Chiswick Chap (talk) 05:24, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Many thanks for the review. Chiswick Chap (talk) 05:24, 27 April 2017 (UTC)