Talk:Multiface

Article needs Improvement
Hi there! I came across this page by accident and noticed that not only does it not cite its sources, but it is also very low on actual information. For example; it does not mention the various different types of multifaces (1, II, 128, 3) and their differences, and it does not mention the Multiprint or the Videoface either. In my humble opinion, some information on Romantic Robot's two software products, Lifeguard and Genie, would be useful here too.

I am quite knowledgable in the area of Multifaces as I owned several in the early 1990s, and could probably write quite a concise article on them. The problem is that my only sources are adverts in magazines from the 80s and 90s (most notably Your Sinclair and Sinclair User). I have copies of said magazines and can provide issue and page numbers if required, but are adverts considered sufficient as sources for Wikipedia articles, particularly technical articles? Would I cite as if it were an actual article in said magazine? Advice would be greatly appreciated.

AshMHB 18:20, 23 April 2007 (UTC)


 * To reply to this nine-yearold comment: if you know Multifaces, edit away! Link to the ads all you like - there's an archive https://archive.org/details/your-sinclair-magazine
 * If people complain about the sources, they can always try to find better ones themselves. DewiMorgan (talk) 03:05, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

authors / IP owners
There should be more information about the original creators of the Multiface. What happened to the company?

--Mitja i (talk) 11:59, 16 May 2017 (UTC)