Talk:Multimagic square

Order
Order either needs to be defined or the proper "order" linked to. Hackwrench 08:44, 23 July 2006 (UTC) The answer is on the magic square page, though some clarification would still be useful. Hackwrench 08:47, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

3 or 4
I propose that trimagic square and tetramagic square be merged into multimagic square. I'm not sure about bimagic square. We have very little to say about them. I have no objection to the text being merged as separate sections. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 16:53, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Added bimagic square; although there is something to be said about it, the article with that information still wouldn't be very long. — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 21:40, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge completed, in the absence of any evidence to the contrary. — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 00:36, 10 October 2011 (UTC)