Talk:Multipactor effect

Merge

 * 1) Support — Omegatron 14:49, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Support   Lumos3 09:06, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) Support on the condition that Multipactor is redirected to this page - Mindgame123 05:13, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Support
The topics are one and the same (anon)

Merged
I have carried out the merger and left a Redirect at Multipactor. Lumos3 17:09, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Resonance
A resonance is important only in two-surface multipactor, but not in single-surface multipactor. So to make this article general, I think that the resonance should not be mentioned in definition. That is why I described two kinds of multipactor in the mechanism section. --Mindgame123 20:10, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Single surface multipactor.
A single surface multipactor can occur on a metal surface when a static magnetic field is present. This article seems to imply that only a dielectric surface can sustain a multipacting event, which is simply not true. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.114.26.28 (talk) 14:27, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Add image

 * Information to be added or removed:
 * Explanation: This page currently lacks an image. I created an demonstration of the multipactor effect - since I created it using software created by my employer, I figured I would play it safe and run this through the COI procedure.
 * References: Not sure what to reference for an image, but here's a conference paper verifying the accuracy of CST simulations of coaxial multipactor

Thanks for your time! Stephen Murray at CST (talk) 13:05, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

Reply 23-OCT-2018
I've implemented this image, but there are two citation parameters which ought to be activated. When ready to proceed with the requested information, please alter the  template's answer parameter to read from yes to no and enter the information into the reference template which you've added to this talk page. Thank you! Regards,  Spintendo   22:50, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
 * The page and quote parameters. Please enter the page number or pages for the page range that the source resides upon, as well as the verbatim text from the source which confirms the operation of the coaxial multipactor as illustrated. Most notably, the illustration in the reference shows all secondary electrons concentrated at two electric field nodes, whereas your illustration only indicates one node. Please advise.
 * Hello, thanks and sorry for the late reply. For clarity this model just shows one field node (it's a standing wave, so it could have as many or as few nodes as needed). If needed, I can try to replicate the model from the paper exactly, although it might take some time. Stephen Murray at CST (talk) 08:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)