Talk:Multipotentiality

Unsourced articles are at risk of deletion.
It's possible that all of the sourced information on this topic could fit into one section of some other article. Who is looking for sources on this issue? You may find it helpful while reading or editing articles to look at a bibliography of  Intelligence Citations, posted for the use of all Wikipedians who have occasion to edit articles on human intelligence and related issues. I happen to have circulating access to a huge academic research library at a university with an active research program in those issues (and to another library that is one of the ten largest public library systems in the United States) and have been researching these issues since 1989. You are welcome to use these citations for your own research. You can help other Wikipedians by suggesting new sources through comments on that page. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk) 16:20, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

Combine with Polymath?
The polymath article is a more extensive and seems to be the same idea. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.12.183.26 (talk) 10:52, 10 December 2012 (UTC)


 * As this article clearly explains a multipotentialite is not the same as a polymath. A polymath is an expert in several different disciplines, while a multipotentialite simply has an interest in several different disciplines without necessarily being an expert in any of them. In other words a multipotentialite is a potential polymath. Fturco (talk) 17:35, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Neologism
Normally such articles gets deleted within days but this article is surviving since Sept 2006. For the moment just tagged for neologism. If notability is not established, this should go to AfD. 106.217.199.41 (talk) 18:54, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Notable?
Even if polymath isn't the same thing, I don't see why this page isn't a section on another. Beyond defining the term, it makes a number of subjective claims and presents them as fact, and just generally reads like an essay. Even if it is a valid neologism, that doesn't make it a valid encyclopedia article—it seems to belong on Wiktionary. Bruhpedia (talk) 06:57, 26 September 2023 (UTC)