Talk:Multistakeholder governance

Discussions take place here. Click the Edit button on the upper right and enter your thoughts.

Talk
Thanks Bill Woodcock for your comments. The article I edited to add in the new information was a very short article. Most of the content in the introduction has been maintained, even if it has moved within the article. As for the two examples given, I'm sorry to omit them and will see where they can be incorporated. Internet governance examples have been added, but under the more umbrella term of process-oriented multistakeholder groups. If the article was titled Internet Multistakeholder Governance, I would not have changed it, but it seemed like a short article that would benefit from the information I wanted to put in a wikipedia article. If internet governance is something you're knowledgeable about, the article Multi-stakeholder governance needs a lot of work and is only about internet governance. Do you know how to change wikipedia article names, if it's at all possible? Because right now the names are too similar it seems. Once again, thanks for your comments, and this is one of my first articles I've edited, so please forgive any courtesy mistakes I make. OFS2020 (talk) 15:06, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

Uh... OFS2020 has done a very thorough re-write of the article, but one which essentially entirely elides the previous focus of the article, which was on multistakeholderism in the context of Internet governance, the area in which it's universal, and which touches on everyone. I'd be the first to admit that Internet governance is not the only area in which multistakeholderism is used, and I'm very happy to see other examples added. They add legitimacy and breadth. However, in the process, OFS2020 has gutted the actual references to Internet governance, and replaced them with a random assortment of poorly-chosen and minor examples. So I advocate for a less radical re-write which captures the new content, without gutting the old. Bill Woodcock (talk) 20:27, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

The criticisms section was deleted on March 5, 2017 due to the poor quality of the citation. The source of the quote was an email message published on the Civic Society Internet Governance Forum - list http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance. I put in a link to a website with the quote and am looking for a link to the original post. Tomlzz1 (talk) 22:56, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
 * There is a LOT of criticism available about this model that are leaps and bounds better sourced, just quote Hoffman, Mueller, somebody backed by academia, there's literally a pile of articles on this. Why pursue some obscure little citation? --Sn0wflake (talk) 09:21, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Indeed there is lots of criticism out there. I'll endeavor to find something else that reflects this analogy to special interests and the legislative process and insert it. Tomlzz1 (talk) 14:26, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
 * After thinking some more about the removal of the MSM criticism... It would seem more appropriate had you entered a suggestion that a better source be provided, and not removed the concept. Today, that consensus criticism (apparently by Hoffman and Mueller as well as my source) of the MSM is not reflected here. Tomlzz1 (talk) 16:48, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Proposed Deletion
This page covers very little information, and all of the information is already in the Economic Democracy wiki article, which provides much more information anyways

Here is a link to the Economic Democracy wiki article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_democracy — Preceding unsigned comment added by Flutterknight (talk • contribs) 20:51, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
 * The content being covered in another article is not a reason to delete this article. If the content is covered there then this would be a candidate for redirecting to that article.  I looked and do not see where this is mentioned in that article.  the word multistakeholder is never used in the article.  ~ GB fan 15:50, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Merge and rename
Hi everybody! I noticed there were two different articles on multi-stakeholder governance here. The first one at Multi-stakeholder governance, deals primarily with internet governance, while this one seems to be more generally focused. I propose that we merge the contents of this article (that and  have been working hard to re-write) into Multi-stakeholder governance and either turn the content of that page into Internet multi-stakeholder governance or put it as a section within the broader discussion of the topic. Bkissin (talk) 16:58, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Keep both pages but rename both of them
There are three forms of multistakeholder governance (see multistakeholder governance model page). One form is policy-oriented; the second form deals with product, process, and finance standards; and third form is project-oriented. The multistakeholder governance model page covers the generic issue of multistakeholderism. Internet governance, the subject of page incorrectly titled 'multi-stakeholder governance' ,is a key sub-area under the second category. It is then best to keep both pages but to correct the title of 'multi-stakeholder governance' to read 'internet multistakeholder governance' and to delete the word 'model' as an unnecessary part of the generic 'multistakeholder governance' title. Public-private-partnership is an example of the third form. Obviously all these pages should be linked and in the future there could well be specialized governance pages dealing with policy multistakeholderism or other forms MaineBenchmark (talk) 21:57, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Oppo a73 wipe all data
Imel1866155052056418 Imel2866155052056400 196.108.227.35 (talk) 22:13, 20 April 2022 (UTC)