Talk:Muma Gee

Image position
Thank you for your edits. Image from section 2007 which you have moved to the section 2011 was from 2008 and is only relevant in the section 2007-2010 since it was at the 2008 Headies. Stanleytux (talk) 05:51, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Furthermore, the images are arranged in the article according to their respective years. For example, adding a 2010 image to a 2004 section of an article is just not right. Stanleytux (talk) 06:08, 15 May 2014 (UTC)


 * I didn't mean no harm bro. I was going to undo that particular edit, but you've already done it. I tweaked the images because they were sort of looking awkward on a 27 inch monitor.  V e r s a c e 1 6 0 8   (Talk) 10:17, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
 * The word 'Awkward' is pretty vast in its meaning. Perhaps a more precise explanation may help understanding. I have already previewed the article from multiple screens and haven't noticed any fault in image alignment. Stanleytux (talk) 11:41, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
 * The article's paragraphs are condensed and widened on a 27 inch screen. This makes the discography section align at the half mark of the second image (with the caption Mama Gee, December 2011). The screen also places the first image (with the caption Muma Gee at The Headies Awards, March 2008) right below the infobox. This is why I felt that it was awkward. Most people reading the article probably won't be reading it from really huge screens. Like I said, I didn't mean no harm and you undoing my revision is fine.  V e r s a c e 1 6 0 8    (Talk) 15:28, 15 May 2014 (UTC)