Talk:Mumbai Mirror/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: -ink&fables (talk · contribs) 16:25, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

The article looks really good. Would leave a review very soon.  -ink&amp;fables  «talk»  16:25, 8 July 2021 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

 The article was really easy to review because of its quality. There are few which I would like to share. Please let me know if you disagree with anything proposed.  -ink&amp;fables  «talk»  06:42, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * I didn't found any grammatical mistake. It does follow all the MoS, word choices are good, and definitive words are properly linked to respective Wikipedia article. This article doesn't have any list.  -ink&amp;fables  «talk»  06:42, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * All the facts and statements are very well supported with reliable sources (and almost all the cited websites/newspapers have Wikipedia article). I didn't detect any OR and copyvio.  -ink&amp;fables  «talk»  06:42, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * It does cover all the major aspects considering the topic. It is focused as well.  -ink&amp;fables  «talk»  06:42, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * In my opinion the article is neutral as well.  -ink&amp;fables  «talk»  06:42, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * I did found there was an edit war last year, but it is stable as of now.  -ink&amp;fables  «talk»  06:42, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * The logo used in the infobox has been tagged for re-creation into a svg file, but that doesn't matter here. The image used in the infobox don't have a caption.  -ink&amp;fables  «talk»  06:42, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Suggestions

 * Infobox
 * Add caption for image using parameter '| caption =' [for reference see The Jakarta Post]
 * For 'type =' parameter; I think adding 'Weekly newspaper' with time period in brackets along with "Daily newspaper (2005–2020)" using unbulleted list or plainlist will be a good idea.
 * Downsizing
 * Metropolitan Media Company Ltd → Metropolitan Media Company Ltd. OR Metropolitan Media Company Limited
 * References
 * Archive all the references
 * [6]: Add wikilink to Newslaundry
 * External links
 * Use Template:Official website for official website
 * Remove from India-newspaper-stub category

Verdict
Waiting for the improvements and comments (if any) from the nominator.  -ink&amp;fables  «talk»  06:42, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
 * , I've implemented the suggestions except the one about type parameter. The paper hasn't started publishing as a weekly, at present it only exists as a website. It's likely they will only start publishing next year. None of this has been documented by reliable secondary sources yet so I can't add that in the article either. I also seem to be unable to use IABot right now, don't think archiving is necessary for a GA? Tayi Arajakate  Talk 07:26, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
 * No, archiving is not necessary for GA but a good practice in my opinion. Congratulations!! on your successful GAN.  -ink&amp;fables  «talk»  07:39, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Alright, thank you for taking the time to review the nomination! Tayi Arajakate  Talk 07:44, 9 July 2021 (UTC)