Talk:Mump and Smoot

reads like a resume?
what kind of resumes have you been reading that resemble this?? (no offense)Gzuckier 19:04, 15 September 2006 (UTC)


 * None taken. The resume tag, I admit, is something less than accurate. I wanted to draw attention to the fact that the article currently reads something like a promotional pamphlet or, perhaps, the first page of a website, than an actual biography. After all, the first half consists exclusively of a description of the act. Certainly, I think you'll agree, it doesn't follow the guidelines of WP:MOSBIO. Victoriagirl 19:33, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I see what you mean. There isn't an appropriate wikitag. There's not much else to draw from, though. What to do?? Invent a new wikitag! Gzuckier 19:33, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

the 3 and 1 added in 2007?
In 2007 November 66.186.93.106 added "[3]" and "[1]" to article. Would you agree those "[3]" and "[1]" were intended to refer to two links in what was the "References" section? --EarthFurst (talk) 21:57, 23 December 2009 (UTC)