Talk:Mundo Perdido, Tikal/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: MathewTownsend (talk · contribs) 18:44, 7 April 2012 (UTC)


 * I'll review this article. MathewTownsend (talk) 18:44, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
 * review
 * I made a few edits which you are free to alter.

GA review-see WP:WIAGA for criteria (and here for what they are not)


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose: clear and concise, correct spelling and grammar:
 * B. Complies with MoS for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. Provides references to all sources:
 * AGF for Spanish language and unavailable sources
 * B. Provides in-line citations from reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Main aspects are addressed:
 * B. Remains focused:
 * 1) Does it follow the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * This is a topic that is technical from my point of view. It contains architectural information regarding structures built by an extinct civilization, so it necessarily has little information on the people originating these edifices. The article is carefully written and sourced. And it is well organized. The author has done a good job of presenting the material.
 * Congratulations! MathewTownsend (talk) 19:26, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review Mathew - best regards, Simon Burchell (talk) 19:58, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * This is a topic that is technical from my point of view. It contains architectural information regarding structures built by an extinct civilization, so it necessarily has little information on the people originating these edifices. The article is carefully written and sourced. And it is well organized. The author has done a good job of presenting the material.
 * Congratulations! MathewTownsend (talk) 19:26, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review Mathew - best regards, Simon Burchell (talk) 19:58, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
 * This is a topic that is technical from my point of view. It contains architectural information regarding structures built by an extinct civilization, so it necessarily has little information on the people originating these edifices. The article is carefully written and sourced. And it is well organized. The author has done a good job of presenting the material.
 * Congratulations! MathewTownsend (talk) 19:26, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review Mathew - best regards, Simon Burchell (talk) 19:58, 12 April 2012 (UTC)