Talk:Municipality of the District of Chester

Requested move 16 January 2017

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: moved as proposed. As there is no other article with this name, there is no need for disambiguation. Brad v  15:42, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

Chester Municipal District, Nova Scotia → Municipality of the District of Chester – move over redirect per established consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Nova Scotia Hwy43 (talk) 01:17, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
 * This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:45, 16 January 2017 (UTC)


 * :: But add ", Nova Scotia" to distinguish from Chester in England, etc. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:45, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
 * As this is the only possible topic in the world that would compete for the title of "Municipality of the District of Chester", disambiguation beyond that is not necessary. It is a unique name unless there is another municipality out there with the exact same official legal name. Hwy43 (talk) 06:18, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Chester in England (where I have often visited) also has a municipality. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 08:55, 16 January 2017 (UTC)


 * I strongly support the move. Although there is a Chester in England, there is no Municipality of the District of Chester which is the admittedly cumbersome, but official name for the place. Also looking at the Chester page, it appears Chester is an unparished area within the unitary authority of Cheshire West and Chester, meaning there would be no municipality within Chester proper also called Chester and so no conflict would arise. Mattximus (talk) 22:31, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Support. Nova Scotia not needed as the name of Chester UK's municipal govt is Cheshire West and Chester, names are not similar.  A disambig or not to be confused on the page should suffice. WayeMason (talk) 22:59, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Strongly support. -- B.S. Lawrence (talk) 19:18, 21 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.