Talk:Murder of Jong-Ok Shin

Untitled
I worry that this entire page was written by someone who is keen to suggest that the man in jail for murder did not in fact commit the murder. It is a rather biased account. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.31.44.4 (talk) 15:54, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

The article has been very well written and reflects the facts expressed on www.Omarbenguit.co.uk There has to be serious doubt regarding the conviction, as it was based solely on the evidence given by a motley group of crack addicts living in the environs of Dorset - one of whom was able to "remember" after more than a year the exact size and details of the knife that was used in the murder, which she testified was possessed by Benguit.

The Italian police had sent Dorset police a telegram warning them of the potential danger of Danilo Restivo who had moved into the local area - and lo and behold at the very spot on the pavement where the victim Oki Shin was found, a fresh clump of human hair was lying next to her body - and so close in fact that it was photographed on the ground by the police within the security tent that had been erected around the body to preserve the crime scene. There is more to this case than meets the eye. Londonlinks (talk) 09:31, 4 October 2023 (UTC)