Talk:Murdering Oscar (And Other Love Songs)/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: ©   Tb hotch ™ (en-2.5). 22:14, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality (prose is clear and concise, without exceeding quotations, or spelling and grammar errors):
 * B. MoS compliance (included, but not limited to: lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources (it also includes an appropriate reference section):
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary (including direct quotations):
 * C. No original research:
 * D. No copyright violations:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * edit wars, multiple edits not related to the GAN process, etc. (this excludes blatant vandalism):
 * 1) Does it contain images (or other media) to illustrate (or support) the topic?
 * A. Images (and other media) are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images (and other media) are provided where possible and are relevant, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * edit wars, multiple edits not related to the GAN process, etc. (this excludes blatant vandalism):
 * 1) Does it contain images (or other media) to illustrate (or support) the topic?
 * A. Images (and other media) are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images (and other media) are provided where possible and are relevant, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images (and other media) are provided where possible and are relevant, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

OK, I think I fixed everything. Everymorning (talk) 16:25, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
 * You still missing the incosistent and incorrect use of dates (as I said, it is mdy, not dmy), the incorrect italics in some sources (like Metacritic, AllMusic, MSN, Robert Christgau, etc.)--use either |publisher= or noitalic. Also, Personnel section is unsourced (source 11 can help with that, this was my miss). ©   Tb hotch ™ (en-2.5). 23:51, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Should I replace every source that uses the website= parameter with the publisher= parameter instead? Everymorning (talk) 00:37, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
 * You use itallics when the work is physically published (like magazines and newspapers). Anyway, you have answered the issues I had, so I pass its GA nomination. Congratulations. ©   Tb hotch ™ (en-2.5). 03:37, 16 November 2017 (UTC)