Talk:Murray v. Pearson

Ruling
Currently this stub reads as though the court ruled that racial segregation was wrong. However a contributor at Talk:Thurgood Marshall argues that it upheld the "separate but equal" status, and found that the Law School was in breach of the "equal" bit - but since the court couldn't create separate laws schools it had to abolish the separate status to deliver equal provision.

Is anyone able to write this clearer? Timrollpickering 03:00, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Murray v. Pearson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080510131119/http://www.aaregistry.com/african_american_history/1273/Murray_v_Pearson_ruled to http://www.aaregistry.com/african_american_history/1273/Murray_v_Pearson_ruled

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 20:19, 8 February 2018 (UTC)