Talk:Musée du Quai Branly – Jacques Chirac

Controversy?
Something needs to be said of the controversy of this museum. I'll try to translate some of the info from the French article. - AKeen 19:08, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

I find the part about the return of the return of Maori warrior head biased and subjective. Unsuitable for an encyclopedia. - Maarten, 22 february 2009

Same here. Written from a one-sided point of view, attributes statements to named individuals without source, talks about laws without referencing them. David.Monniaux (talk) 11:01, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Musée du quai Branly. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081015171047/http://www.iht.com:80/articles/2006/06/27/features/branly.php? to http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/06/27/features/branly.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 11:51, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Musée du quai Branly - Jacques Chirac. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070926235341/http://www.quaibranly.fr/en/enseignement/scientific-publications/gradhiva-previous-issues/index.html to http://www.quaibranly.fr/en/enseignement/scientific-publications/gradhiva-previous-issues/index.html
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/06/27/features/branly.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 21:19, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Placement of the museum's history in the article
Hello, when I imagine a reader who wants to know the main information about this museum, I think the long section about its history should come near the end. - After all, not everybody is interested in this history, and the article is long enough not to obstruct the reader's interest from the beginning. - Is there any rule or convention about how to present a modern museum or what do others think about this? - Munfarid1 10:45, 1 August 2019 (UTC)Munfarid1

Number of visitors per year
In the first sentence, it says Paris has 30 million foreign visitors per year, and the last sentence of the same paragraph claims 3 million. To me, this doesn't make sense. As numbers fluctuate every year, I suggest quoting a more general number, something like: "Since 2000, Paris has attracted more than xx million visitors per year." It would be useful, if someone could verify and correct this. Munfarid1 21:12, 1 August 2019 (UTC)