Talk:Musa va 'Uj/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Frzzl (talk · contribs) 13:29, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Hi! I'll take on this review. Spotchecks will come. 13:29, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
 * That was swift, passing. Thank you for an excellent article on a very interesting subject - I enjoyed a brief foray into Persian art! 14:12, 22 December 2023 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Very well written indeed; refs are well formatted. My only request would be to link folio in "Physical description" strike that, it's so minor that I've done it.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): {{GAList/check|}y} c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * Sources are reliable; eMost sources are offline, so Earwig wasn't very helpful; I couldn't really find any major problems in the sources I could access. I've added links to searchable Google Books on a couple of the refs.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * The article covers the main topics; it integrates background and the history of the work well
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * No problems found.
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * I'd be impressed if there was an edit war on this article; it's stable and you're the main editor.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Images all have valid copyright tags; the captions are fine.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Spotchecks
I've checked all usages of the Phillips 2020, Robinson, and the Nozourian 2019. I also looked at the Rogers "The Art of Islam" - everything seems fine to me; I'm happy to AGF on the offline sources.