Talk:Muscle imbalance

symptoms
"the recuperation of the joint affected is left untreated causing either tension or restriction to flexibility and strength of the prime movers" - this reads as an unintelligible gibberish. whether because the source is pretending to be an expert by misuse of complicated words, or because the whole concept discussed here is a fake-medicine concept, in itself or the misuse of a valid concept for fake-medicine agenda. my guess its the first case, but im not 100% sure. 89.134.199.32 (talk) 18:17, 14 March 2019 (UTC).

tennis elbow
this section says nothing about an imballance between opposite muscles, which is a glaring contradiction to what is written in the lede section that is all about this alleged imballance being the cause of problems. this further strengthens the impression that the article is describing a fake/bogus/fad concept instead of a valid one. 89.134.199.32 (talk) 18:25, 14 March 2019 (UTC).