Talk:MusicBrainz Picard

wxWidgets and Mac OS X
"Currently development is focusing on the Linux & Windows editions as the current version of wxPython (specifically wxWidgets) has severe flaws on Mac OS X."

I know that it is stated on the musicbrainz blogthat wxWidgets on OS X, even the 2.6.x version, is still not ready for prime time But here is a list of "Software that uses wxWidgets". These are Mac OS X programs I have used and haven't found the issues mentioned in the blog: aMule - 'All-platform' P2P client based on eMule

Audacity - an open source sound editor

VLC media player - cross platform multimedia player So I think the part as the current version of wxPython (specifically wxWidgets) has severe flaws on Mac OS X should be deleted.

Udoschmitz 02:12, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

you obviously haven't tried using wxPicard under OS X or linux then :D it really is borked, we get like 3 people talking about bugs related to wxWidgets a week in the irc /forum. as a side note, picard is being ported to QT, which shoukd solve all these issues and more. ZaphodBeeblebrox 07:33, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

User Interface
This app has the worst user interface of any consumer level program I've ever used. The workflow is utterly bamboozling. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.149.202.165 (talk • contribs) 13:24, 22 April 2007
 * I just want to mention that the above post is more than a year old and the program was rewritten and has a different interface now. --JonnyJD (talk) 00:48, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

intro
Picard is intended to be the next generation of tagger for MusicBrainz, with a focus on album oriented tagging as opposed to track based tagging and cross platform compatibility.

Maybe better this way?

Picard is intended to be the next generation of tagger for MusicBrainz, with a focus on cross platform compatibility and album oriented tagging as opposed to track based tagging. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.170.41.38 (talk) 14:20, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Development
Section goes into alot irrelevant details about versions of Python used, but fails to explain properly what the application actually does. Recent new paragraph added is not written in a neutral way and incorrectly implies there has been no devlopment at all since 2009 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ijabz (talk • contribs) 14:13, 28 February 2018 (UTC)