Talk:Music of Algeria/Archive 1

Untitled
I believe the section on Raï should be moved to Raï and a smaller overview of what rai is should be on this article. Anyone have any other ideas before I do it?Aggelophoros 04:45, 14 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 * How much are you thinking? Generally, articles are split out when they reach about 32k in size (see Page size), and I don't think this one is close.  However, a paragraph or two could be easily trimmed. Tuf-Kat 08:48, Feb 14, 2004 (UTC)
 * I understand what you're saying. I was thinking about swapping the content on the two articles, but a redirect page from Raï to here may be better. The page Raï is quite redundant in comparison to what is already contained on this article. Is that a better action? Aggelophoros 05:21, 15 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 * I didn't realize the rai article was so short... I suppose the bulk of the text here maybe could be moved there. I would suggest combining the modern history bits of the two sections (kabylian folk and rai) and remove anything that seems too detailed for an article on the music of Algeria.  I know I was the one that originally did it this way, but I think it would be better to make a single unified musical history of all modern Algeria for this article, and place the details of the genres and performers and such on their respective pages.

I don't know if I'm making any sense, but my point is that this doesn't read like an article on Algerian music -- it reads like two articles, one on rai and one on kabylian folk, combined one on top of the other. Combine the two, and I think the extraneous bits will be apparent and can be moved to rai. Tuf-Kat 07:11, Feb 15, 2004 (UTC)

hawzii or hawzi ?
hawzii ? --Mario scolas (talk) 07:52, 29 February 2008 (UTC) hawzii is no a redirect of Music of North Africa different of de Hawfi, but a style of andalousian music. --Mario scolas (talk) 07:55, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Dahman harrachi.jpg
The image File:Dahman harrachi.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
 * That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --06:32, 12 February 2011 (UTC)