Talk:Music of the Front Mission series/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

I'll be reviewing the article over the next few days. Below you will find the standard GAN criteria, along with a list of issues I have found. As criteria pass, a or  will be replaced with a. Below the criteria you'll see a list of issues I've found. Feel free to work on them at any time. I will notify you when I'm done checking over the article. At that time I'll allow the standard one week for fixes to be made.

Criteria
For further detail, see WP:WIAGA


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Issues found
No images, article is stable, and no external link or disambig issues. I'll be looking over the prose and checking references next.


 * References 7 and 8 have no publisher
 * Reference 23 has no author (article states Chris Greening conducted the interview)
 * Fixed Refs 7, 8, and 23. -- Pres N  21:15, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

Lead
 * "The soundtracks of the series' installments have been released in album form in Japan, with the exceptions of 2089, 2089-II, and Border of Madness, which reuse music from the other installments, and Evolved, published in 2010." - was Evolved published in 2010? This sentence is a bit confusing.
 * Tweaked a bit, tell me if that helps. -- Pres N  21:15, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

Verdict - Everything else looks good. Nice job on the article. I'll PASS it now. If you have time, please review an article in the GAN list to pay it forward.

Reviewer: Teancum (talk) 20:13, 9 November 2010 (UTC)