Talk:Music of the Mana series/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''


 * GA review (see here for criteria)

I haven't got much to say here really: it's well written and on par with your previous discography articles, and feel you did a solid amount of work on it. It's surprisingly thought provoking too, as this is a series that's rather easy to overlook in light of other mainstream series. Nicely done!--Kung Fu Man (talk) 23:26, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: