Talk:Muslim conquest of Khorasan

Suggestion: Merge Islamic conquest of Afghanistan with this Article
I Suggest the previous article be merged with this one since early Muslim sources do not mention "Afghanistan" as a separate territory. The Term "Khorasan" in Muslim sources refers to the modern Iranian provinces of Khorasan as well as Tajikistan and Afghanistan and parts of Turkmenistan (if not all of it), and when these sources speak about the Conquest of Khorasan they usually mention this area as a whole. The other parts of the article could be gathered in a separate part such as "Khorasan under Muslim Rule".--باسم (talk) 11:28, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
 * what do you think?--باسم (talk) 09:57, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Support I think it's a good idea.--NadirAli نادر علی (talk) 07:09, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Oppose First, what constitutes Afghanistan (i.e., its people, history, culture, and geography) has always (for the most part) been connected to South Asia (i.e., the Indian subcontinent). Secondly and most importantly, the conquest of Khorasan was completed within 5 years in the 7th century, but the conquest of Afghanistan took place 100s of years later by completely different armies. Those Muslim sources made clear that Afghanistan was not part of Khorasan but connected to Hind (India).--Mir Ahmad Shah (talk) 13:45, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Support: Khorasan's article is poorly sourced and doesn't include all places and events. The conquest of Khorasan was quite long affair and extended into many countries of Central Asia. MonsterHunter32 (talk) 20:15, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Oppose: Muslim conquest of Khorasan covers a wider area than Afghanistan, and the article focusses on an earlier period. The Muslim conquests of Afghanistan is, however, well-sourced and independently notable. I therefore think that two should remain distinct as merging to Muslim conquest of Khorasan would unreasonably weight later conquests in Afghanistan. Klbrain (talk) 09:51, 23 June 2018 (UTC)