Talk:MutualArt Group

Clean up
I've tackled the advertorial and general clean-up, someone else can have a go. I'm unsure of the importance of this one Chrismorey (talk) 06:37, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
 * In spite of being created for money by User:BiH, this article probably now meets our criteria for inclusion; some sources are reliable and in-depth, while the subject makes clear claims to significance and importance. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:36, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Artist Pension Trust. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140202124504/http://www.arttactic.com/podcasts/latest-podcast/588-moti-shniberg-artist-pension-trust.html to http://www.arttactic.com/podcasts/latest-podcast/588-moti-shniberg-artist-pension-trust.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 03:15, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Neutrality
I've reverted to a version covering the 2017 controversy, which seems to have decent sources. Tacyarg (talk) 00:20, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

User has changed back to a version making the company look better. No idea which is correct but probably needs discussion rather than edit warring. Tacyarg (talk) 00:22, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Unsourced "Contract Breach Scandal"
Is there any reason for this completely unsourced section added in Special:Diff/1200535097 to be kept? Asking here to avoid further edit warring. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 19:21, 29 January 2024 (UTC)