Talk:My Big Fat Greek Rush Week/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Numerounovedant (talk · contribs) 18:04, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

I'll put up the comments shortly! Numerounovedant  Talk  18:04, 18 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Lead
 * At the time of its initial broadcast, the episode was watched by ... people/ In its initial airing
 * "My Big Fat Greek Rush Week" featured - "The episode featired"
 * Plot
 * The opening sentence seems odd "talks about her rape"?
 * "heard Parker having sex, and Parker blames her." - blames her for what? having sex?her rape? it is awkwardly written
 * "Keith (Enrico Colantoni) hikes through the desert." - How does that fit in here?
 * "Wallace’s (Percy Daggs III) and Logan's (Jason Dohring) sociology professor recruits volunteers for a Stanford prison experiment-like study."
 * "Cormac (Jason Beghe) starts following Keith." - I am really lost here. How does any of that make sense?

The same problem continues throughout the section. Too many short sentences that barely connect to each other. I suggest you re-structure the whole thing, because honestly in its current state none of it seems to be making any sense. Numerounovedant  Talk  19:21, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
 * The section is much more comprehensive now. Still some minor blips: Towards the end seperate the conclusion with some the like "The episode ends with..." and who's Mac?  Numerounovedant   Talk  17:16, 26 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Production
 * "Levine had previously worked with star Chris Lowell on the recently cancelled Life as We Know It" - recently? it's awkwardly written plus recently further complicates the sentence. Recent to the episode airing? or now?
 * Ratings
 * Same as Lead
 * Is there nothing more to the section? Maybe if you add the viewrship rankings and/or Nielsen Ratings it becomes more comprehensive. You may also compare the ratings to that of the previous episode and show the trend in viewrship throught that. Numerounovedant   Talk  17:16, 26 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Reception
 * Will add comments shortly.
 * "indicating that it was "great""- does the score indicates that it was great?(if so remove the quotes) or did he say so?(if so rephrase)
 * It's included as part of the score. Johanna (talk to me!) 03:04, 28 April 2016 (UTC)


 * "very positive" - "postitive"/"lauded the episode"
 * Rowan Kaiser, writing for - remove the comma  Numerounovedant   Talk  17:16, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
 * References
 * Publishers missing in refs 3, 6 & 10
 * That's bizarre. I don't usually make that mistake. Fixed. Johanna (talk to me!) 03:04, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
 * These minor issues are sometimes overlooked! That's perfectly fine.  Numerounovedant   Talk  06:47, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Numerounovedant  Talk  13:24, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I have responded to all your comments so far. I am looking forward to hearing your remaining comments on the article! :) Johanna (talk to me!) 15:14, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Great work that you are putting into on all the articles relating the topic. just the few queries and I'll be happy to go through with the nomination.  Numerounovedant   Talk  17:16, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I have responded to the rest of your comments. Let me know if there's anything else I can do. Johanna (talk to me!) 03:04, 28 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Final Comments
 * All my queries were addressed. Well done!  Numerounovedant   Talk  06:47, 28 April 2016 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: