Talk:My Delirium/GA2

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

Reassessor: Till I Go Home

Lead
 * Lead is inappropriate, there is insufficient text and does not fully address main aspects of the topic.
 * 'Musician' - perhaps change it to 'singer'?
 * "The third track on Ladyhawke's eponymous debut album" - do you mean third single?
 * "sold over 70,000 copies in Australia" - first you should discuss the chart performance, then sales/certifications.
 * "peaked at number 9 on the New Zealand Music Charts" - '9' is unacceptable, it should be a word not number. 'New Zealand Music Charts'; this is unclear. What music chart; album chart? Singles chart?

Background and writing
 * Looks good

Composition
 * The article needs a composition section.

Critical reception
 * "In its review, Allmusic said the song..." - surely someone with a name reviewed it, Allmusic itself did not.

Music video
 * "The music video for "My Delirium" was directed by Benji Davies and Jim Field, known as Frater." - who is known as Frater, Benji or Field?
 * When was the video directed, and where was it directed?
 * Red links which need either fixing or removing.

Use in the media is a bunch of unsourced trivia, remove it.

Charts
 * Per typical certifications tables, this is unacceptable. See this for a good quality example.

Track listing
 * Which release version was this? UK? New Zealand? Not specified.

References
 * Ref 22 is dead.
 * Refs 27 and 28 are bare, fix them. A link to the site is not enough, they need the title, publisher and access date.

Overall
 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:


 * It's been seven days and there still has been no major improvement to the article. Sorry but that's a delist. The article can be re-nominated at any time but these issues should be addressed. Till I Go Home (talk) 01:02, 12 February 2012 (UTC)