Talk:My Friend Hitler

Can "The Great Soviet Encyclopedia" really be considered as a valid source to judge Mishimas work as anti-fascist/fascist?

Leaving aside the the guaranteed ideological bias of any state owned literary production in the USSR, it is just an encyclopedia, oriented towards a brief summary and not a comprehensive analysis of the work. 193.40.244.205 (talk) 01:32, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Is it was a rhetorical question? Can "Britannica" really be considered as a valid source? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.141.233.189 (talk) 00:49, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

why bother editing rubbish like this when people just remove corrections?
--Daveymac41 (talk) 10:41, 5 July 2017 (UTC) I get fed up with people trying to protect their versions of articles because they like them, with no regard to objectivity or truth. The play IS considered sententious and tedious.--Daveymac41 (talk) 10:46, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on My Friend Hitler. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://archive.is/20120717095848/http://spb.geometria.ru/articles/reviews/1756 to http://spb.geometria.ru/articles/reviews/1756

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 19:12, 9 February 2018 (UTC)