Talk:My Girl (2005 TV series)

Fair use rationale for Image:717-30 20051205185119.jpg
Image:717-30 20051205185119.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 07:59, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

My Girl tv series and My Girl Philippine tv series
I noticed that their is information in this article about the Philippine version of the Korean drama My Girl. It is confusing to me as to why information about the Philippine version of the series is in this article when there is an entire separate article dedicated to the Philippine version. I believe that the information on the Philippine version should be removed from this ariticle since this article is dedicated to the original series. I will remove the information on the Philippine version in the near future unless anyone has a valid objection. Thank You

Gron01 (talk) 04:11, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

episode ratings
The ratings sections need to have each rating sourced to a specific URL. The "source" given is just a website homepage, and any user who doesn't know Korean would not be able to find the info. Ω pho  is  11:14, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Well the TNS links have always been this way on Wikipedia.  Ink Heart ♥ 11:55, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
 * It is incorrectly done, then. A proper citation must be given, either directly linking to the info, or giving instructions on how to find the info. Ω  pho  is  11:57, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Well go luck finding an exact link to K-drama ratings cause there hard to find. That's why editors generally just put the homepage link. I believe the link is good enough because if you know K-dramas than you know TNS media has verifiable ratings. Another thing please don't follow my edits anymore. I can see it in my watchlist wherever I make an edit you pop up after me and change something. If I need help I ask. Thank you.  Ink Heart ♥ 12:00, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Judging by your recent edits, you still don't understand how wiki policy works. I'm keeping tabs to make sure you don't continue this streak. As for the ratings, per BURDEN, it is your responsibility to find the sources, if you are to remove the template. Ω  pho  is  12:30, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
 * I already have an editors watching my edits I don't need another Ophois. I would rather you not watch my edits please, you not admin and you have a history of blocks as well, more then myself. You do your thing and I will do mine meaning you edit your supernatural articles and I will edit the K-articles. someone has just suggested to me to adopt a help editor so you don't need to follow me around. I've always had a good record since you came along Ophois. I am not being rude just telling the truth. And since you've been "monitoring" me I've been getting in trouble so I would rather you, specifically, not watch me. Thank you. Ink Heart ♥ 13:01, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The only reason you got in trouble was because you disregarded policies, despite multiple editors explaining to you multiple times how things work. I think the help editor is a good idea, because you seem to have a passion for editing the Korean articles, and that will help you follow policy.  Ω  pho  is  13:11, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Trivia section
Trivia sections in articles are generally looked down upon (please read Trivia sections for further information), so rather than just delete and re-add it, can someone find a means to write that information into the body of article THEN remove the trivia section?  on camera (t)  00:30, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
 * There is no need to integrate the information. Most of the stuff is both unsourced and already mentioned elsewhere in the article. The double-broadcast is unsourced fancruft. I tried to integrate the timeslot (which too could be argued to be unsourced fancruft) into the broadcast section, but as usual InkHeart/Colleen16 instantly reverted any edits made.  Ω  pho  is  08:25, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
 * As usual is the case. She really doesn't seem to understand she doesn't own an article and whatever.  It's tiresome repeating it to her.   on  camera (t)  00:19, 20 November 2009 (UTC)