Talk:My Little Buckaroo

Notability
According to Wikipedia, a film can have an article if it fits the following.

"The film is historically notable, as evidenced by one or more of the following: Publication of at least two non-trivial articles, at least five years after the film's initial release. The film was deemed notable by a broad survey of film critics, academics, or movie professionals, when such a poll was conducted at least five years after the film's release.[2] The film was given a commercial re-release, or screened in a festival, at least five years after initial release. The film was featured as part of a documentary, program, or retrospective on the history of cinema."

"My Little Buckaroo" was re-released 5 years later. Yay Dad (talk) 18:08, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
 * the idea of notability because of its historical importance is certainly a fair claim. Can you explain better how you're making such a claim for this particular short? Was it deemed notable by a broad survey of critics or was it featured by documentary on the history on animation or does it have two non-trivial articles? Regardless of which one of these can you provide the citation/source which confirms that claim of notability? Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 19:29, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

The only thing I could find was that it was the second Blue Ribbon reissue. I guess it doesn't really need an article. It is a rare short. Yay Dad (talk) 03:49, 4 May 2018 (UTC)