Talk:My Opposition/GA1

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

I am reassessing this articles GA status as part of the WP:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force/Sweeps process. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:56, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose):
 * b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references):
 * b (citations to reliable sources):
 * c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its scope.
 * a (major aspects):
 * b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
 * b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * I was initially concerned at the references to an unpublished book, but following the talk page discussion, I appreciate what is going on. Has the book been published yet?  If so it would be good to see the references adjusted. I am happy to mainating the GA status. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:17, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
 * b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * I was initially concerned at the references to an unpublished book, but following the talk page discussion, I appreciate what is going on. Has the book been published yet?  If so it would be good to see the references adjusted. I am happy to mainating the GA status. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:17, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * I was initially concerned at the references to an unpublished book, but following the talk page discussion, I appreciate what is going on. Has the book been published yet?  If so it would be good to see the references adjusted. I am happy to mainating the GA status. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:17, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Pass/Fail:
 * I was initially concerned at the references to an unpublished book, but following the talk page discussion, I appreciate what is going on. Has the book been published yet?  If so it would be good to see the references adjusted. I am happy to mainating the GA status. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:17, 21 June 2009 (UTC)


 * According to Dr. Sascha Feuchert of Justus Liebig University, co-editor of the Diary of Friedrich Kellner, the diary will be published February 2010 by Wallstein Verlag (Publishers) in Göttingen, Germany. It will be published in two volumes, a total of 1,200 pages.  At that time, I will include proper reference to the book. --Rskellner (talk) 00:32, 22 June 2009 (UTC)