Talk:Mycena clariviolacea/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Ucucha 00:02, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

Now this is a nice set—I'll see how far I can get. This one has rather too much unexplained jargon; I've listed some specific suggestions below.
 * Thanks very much for picking up these reviews. The original descriptions by Takahashi were essentially pure mycojargon; after "translating" eight of them I guess a few words slipped through. Sasata (talk) 02:42, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, I had a quick look at Takahashi's paper and it is far worse; that doesn't mean you can't improve further. :-) I'll pass this and the other two I reviewed. Ucucha 23:20, 8 October 2010 (UTC)


 * The lead contains too much unexplained jargon. I explained "amyloid", but what are the three kinds of cystidia and what is diverticulate?
 * Glossed and linked. Sasata (talk) 02:42, 8 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Wouldn't the Latin for "clear" be clarus? Clari is the form used in compounds, I believe.
 * I dunno, I'm just following the sources :) Feel free to modify as you see fit. Sasata (talk) 02:42, 8 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Gloss hygrophanous, tomentum, hymenophoral, dextrinoid, repent (is that even an adjective?), utriform, ladeniform.
 * All done. Sasata (talk) 02:42, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

Ucucha 00:02, 8 October 2010 (UTC)