Talk:Mycena intersecta/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Rcej (Robert) - talk 01:48, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

Nice... and I'm sure you'll put his picture up when/if you can :) A couple things:
 * In Descr., mention/ref unknown edibility
 * Hmmm, the original publication doesn't mention edibility. So, while it is true that the edibility is unknown, I can't really ref a negative like that. I could perhaps put in something like "Takahashi's publication does not mention the edibility of this mushroom." Sound reasonable? Sasata (talk) 05:50, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes... proceed and je will pass le 'shroom! :) Rcej (Robert) - talk 06:10, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Added! Sasata (talk) 06:22, 9 October 2010 (UTC)


 * In Micro. chars.;
 * Clarify what you mean by "element hyphae" in snippet "The hymenophoral tissue is made of thin-walled element hyphae that are 5–18 µm wide,..."
 * Basically, it means the "unit cell", or "the typical, representative hyphae", but I reworded it to remove "element", as it doesn't lose any meaning without it. Sasata (talk) 05:50, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
 * It reads like we have contrasting definitions of 'caulocystidia' here: "...irregularly shaped caulocystidia (cystidia on the stem) that are olive-brown, inamyloid, and thin-walled. The terminal cells (caulocystidia) are 13–29 by 3–7 µm, broadly club-shaped to irregularly shaped, and often have one to three knob-like excrescences." :) Rcej (Robert) - talk 03:52, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Here terminal cells=caulocystidia (=large hyphal cell), but I just removed "terminal cell" as it adds confusion without making it any more precise. Thanks! Sasata (talk) 05:50, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

Pass!

Results of review

 * GA review (see here for criteria)

The article Mycena intersecta passes this review, and has been promoted to good article status. The article is found by the reviewing editor to be deserving of good article status based on the following criteria:
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: