Talk:Mycena nargan/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

rev Reviewer: Rcej (Robert) - talk 04:39, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

Nice :) Thingies:
 * Mention/src unknown edibility in Descr.
 * I've mentioned, but haven't been able to specifically source "unknown" yet. Have pinged Casliber for help, and am hoping it's mentioned in one of his Australian field guides. Sasata (talk) 03:01, 18 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Refs number 6 and 8 appear to have dead links. Rcej (Robert) - talk 08:23, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Updated one link, but had to remove the other, as it seems to have disappeared off the web. As a nice consolation prize, I was able to add another photo from a fungus lover from Down Under who kindly released one of his pics for our cause :) Sasata (talk) 03:01, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Pass! And kudos to Mr. Leithhead! Rcej (Robert) - talk 05:27, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

Results of review

 * GA review (see here for criteria)

The article Mycena nargan passes this review, and has been promoted to good article status. The article is found by the reviewing editor to be deserving of good article status based on the following criteria:
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: