Talk:Mycena polygramma/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Rcej (Robert) - talk 07:50, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

Nice! Just one tidbit: In taxonomy; anymore on the walk from Agaricus to Mycena? Rcej (Robert) - talk 06:13, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes—Gray was one of several who thought Fries' genus Agaricus was too unwieldy, and renamed a bunch of species by making his subgenera into genera. Have added this info to the article. Sasata (talk) 07:02, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Anotha done!! :) Rcej (Robert) - talk 06:31, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Results of review

 * GA review (see here for criteria)

The article Mycena polygramma passes this review, and has been promoted to good article status. The article is found by the reviewing editor to be deserving of good article status based on the following criteria:
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: