Talk:Mycena sanguinolenta/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Rcej (Robert) - talk 07:59, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

Nice again! Two things:
 * In taxonomy, a teensy more about Agaricus to Mycena? (deja vu!)
 * Might we stack image:Mycena sanguinolenta2 - lindsey.jpg and image:Mycena sanguinolenta3 - lindsey.jpg for my neatness needs? ;) Rcej (Robert) - talk 08:06, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks again for reviewing! Done x 2! Sasata (talk) 23:53, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
 * YW! Pass. Rcej (Robert) - talk 03:35, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

Results of review

 * GA review (see here for criteria)

The article Mycena sanguinolenta passes this review, and has been promoted to good article status. The article is found by the reviewing editor to be deserving of good article status based on the following criteria:
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: