Talk:Myogenic response

Combine Pages Suggestion
This page should be combined with Myogenic mechanism
 * Yes! I looked at this talk because I couldn't find what I needed and that exact information is in the first sentence of the "Myogenic mechanism" article - which I might never have found. lifeform (talk) 05:40, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Requested move 12 December 2017

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: moved. See no reason to put this off any longer since editors appear to have this mixed bowl of soup under control. Happy New Year to All! (closed by page mover)  Paine Ellsworth   put'r there 13:36, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

Myogenic contraction → Myogenic response – The target is already a redirect; this move is in preparation for a 3-page merge to the new title, and is designed to keep a chunk of the edit history for the oldest of the 3 articles at the target. See merge discussion at Talk:Myogenic mechanism Klbrain (talk) 15:58, 12 December 2017 (UTC) --Relisting. Steel1943  (talk) 22:21, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
 * This is a contested technical request (permalink). TonyBallioni (talk) 22:08, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relisting as per the above, it seems that this move request is directly affected by any result at Talk:Myogenic mechanism, but no conclusion/finalized merge has been made at/per that discussion yet the merge has yet to be performed. (Updated by – Steel1943  (talk) 16:19, 25 December 2017 (UTC)) Most likely, if no resolution is made there, this discussion may need to be closed to "no consensus".
 * Klbrain, since this involves multiple pages, it should be discussed. TonyBallioni (talk) 22:08, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943  (talk) 22:21, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Move per nom. I see an unanimous consensus for merge there, no reason to block the procedure. No such user (talk) 12:37, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I meant that the merge has yet to be performed. Steel1943  (talk) 16:19, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
 * I didn't mean to be condescending to your relist, just made a general note that we shouldn't leave things half-done. As far as I can tell, the merge has been performed: Myogenic response and Bayliss effect both redirect to this article . Edit, sorry: to Myogenic mechanism; this article hasn't been merged yet indeed. No such user (talk) 09:10, 26 December 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.