Talk:Mystery Date (Mad Men)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Gen. Quon (talk · contribs) 14:50, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Those are the only issues I spot. On hold for seven days.--Gen. Quon (talk) 20:44, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Title: The "Mad Men" part of the title needs to be italicized
 * Intro: References aren't needed in the lead, so I'd move [1] and [2] down into the meat of the article
 * Intro: Change "can't" to 'can not'
 * Production: Maybe say who wrote and directed before jumping right into the section
 * Production: Explain what a Clio Award is/Is Writing Pad a reputable source? If so, what is it?
 * References: "down only .1 point from "Tea Leaves"" put a 0 before .1
 * Reception: "The episode received rave reviews from many publications, though some were mixed on the value of the dream sequence." I would change the wording, as a rave review means that it was mostly positive, which doesn't meld with the mixed reception of the dream
 * Problems have been sufficiently resolved. Passing.--Gen. Quon (talk) 18:25, 22 April 2012 (UTC)