Talk:Mythical origins of language/GA2

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

Reassessment started.


 * I feel that this article does not reach the broadness GA criteria. 1000's of scholarly sources on this topic and individual mythologies exist, and this article only gives a short list of examples, with very little discussion of the overall topic or even discussion of the individual examples.
 * The general comments in the lead also do not summarise cited information in the main text, and some paragraphs are completely uncited.
 * The article is also mostly just lists, making it not a disjointed read. There are also problems of single sentence paragraphs and grammar (eg, the second sentence is ungrammatical). T

This article would need a major expansion to retain GA status, as the standards have risen greatly since it was first listed, so i am delisting.  Yob  Mod  14:08, 20 October 2009 (UTC)