Talk:Mythodea/GA1

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

Commencing GA reassessment as part of the GA Sweeps process. ✽ Juniper§ Liege   (TALK)  21:42, 14 February 2010 (UTC)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose):
 * Well written. Subject matter is presented in a developed fashion, using proper paragraphing. No fractured sentences.
 * b (MoS):
 * Conforms to manual of style. Some unnecessary wikilinks, but I have removed these per WP:OVERLINK. Quotes should not be put in italics, so I have undone.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references):
 * Well referenced. References are accurate and links are active.
 * b (citations to reliable sources):
 * Citations are to a various array of sources.
 * c (OR):
 * No evidence of OR.
 * 1) It is broad in its scope.
 * a (major aspects):
 * Addresses major aspect of article subject matter.
 * b (focused):
 * Remains focused. No digressions.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy:
 * No issues concerning POV evident.
 * 1) It is stable:
 * No edit wars etc.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
 * Images are properly tagged and justified.
 * b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Images are accompanied by contextual captions.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Keep/Delist: KEEP ✽  Juniper§ Liege   (TALK)  21:55, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Keep/Delist: KEEP ✽  Juniper§ Liege   (TALK)  21:55, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep/Delist: KEEP ✽  Juniper§ Liege   (TALK)  21:55, 14 February 2010 (UTC)