Talk:NACHA

COI edit requests
Hi! Nacha is a client of mine, and I'd like to request a few updates to this article:

1. FYI, I updated the logo in the infobox to the current logo.

2. I recommend updating the article title to "Nacha", per all current branding of the organization.

3. At beginning of lead: Update  to

4. In second paragraph of lead: Update
 * to
 * (Ref name already in use in article.)
 * (Ref name already in use in article.)
 * (Ref name already in use in article.)

5. In the fourth paragraph of "Initiatives": Update
 * to
 * (New text bolded.)
 * (New text bolded.)
 * (New text bolded.)

Thank you for any help or feedback! Mary Gaulke (talk) 02:39, 9 December 2019 (UTC)


 * I'll note that secondary sources still call it "NACHA" and use its full name . – Thjarkur (talk) 18:32, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

Reply 11-DEC-2019
Below you will see where proposals from your request have been quoted with reviewer decisions and feedback inserted underneath, either accepting, declining or otherwise commenting upon your proposal(s). Please read the enclosed notes within the proposal review section below for information on each request. Spintendo 02:17, 12 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the feedback! Responses to your notes:
 * 1&2. For what it's worth, Nacha's reps have confirmed to me that this is how the org intends to refer to itself moving forward, but I understand external documentation is important. That's been gaining steam as well – here's an example.
 * 3. No problem – the ref name is already in use in the article, but here's the full cite information:
 * 4. The wording you've flagged is already in the article. How about this instead? (New text bolded.)
 * Thanks again! Mary Gaulke (talk) 07:18, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks again! Mary Gaulke (talk) 07:18, 20 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The prose I suggested in my earlier reply "Nacha began the process of changing transaction limits in 2019", is acceptable because it describes a concrete action which has already taken place (that being the beginning of the process of changing transaction limits). That "beginning" is the concrete action which may be described. However, once that prose begins to move towards describing future actions (actions which are still wet, so to speak, and not yet "dried concrete") it becomes no longer acceptable (e.g., " Same Day ACH transaction is set to increase" and "financial institutions are planned to be able to submit" are all future actions without any concrete past actions to be tied to). With regards to the supplied reference, thank you for supplying it, but as I moved to place the claim in the article I noticed that the ACH Network has its own article. Shouldn't this claim be more applicable there rather than here, considering that NACHA concerns the development, administration, and governance of ACH rather than the operation of ACH, which information about their processing volumes seems more germane to.  Spintendo  09:27, 20 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Understood – I'm good with your proposed wording. I think the ACH stat is relevant as a way to illustrate the scope of Nacha's work, but either way, I think we can agree the outdated stat should be removed if not replaced. Mary Gaulke (talk) 17:19, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

COI Edit Requests
Hi - I work for Seven Letter, a public relations firm that represents Nacha. Nacha is seeking to make a few edits to its Wikipedia page.

1. In the infobox, Nacha would like to remove the role of "President Emeritus" and delete "Janet O. Estep". She is no longer affiliated with the organization

2. Also in the infobox, Nacha would like to change the membership number from "440+" to "450+". The 440+ number is from 2016.

Thank you for your help! Rposner17 (talk) 19:53, 22 September 2021 (UTC)